Some people believe that children's leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time
Proper utilization of a child’s leisure time unarguably has huge impact in shaping his future. It is proposed that if a child is indulged in any activity other than educational, is entirely futile. I disagree with this notion. I believe that such approach is deleterious for comprehensive growth of a child and is detrimental for both physical as well as his intellectual growth. This essay shall discus the demerits of such unidirectional approach.
Indulging in only educational activities will restrict a child’s physical growth. It has been evidentially proven that a child, who participate in sports activities or any physical activity are 70% more healthier and are resistant to various diseases. As physical activity increases cellular and nervous regeneration and increases blood supply to brain as well as other organs, thus making him physically fitter both to handle any physical and mental stress. Study conducted by Harvard University concluded that a child indulged in sports have more propensity to grow into a healthier and brainier adult.
In addition to physical activities, participation in arts, music and crafts are essential part of more holistic approach in upbringing of an offspring. Trying hand at arts, craft or listening to music speeds up the cognitive development of brain centers. It is a common belief that if a child spends more of his tome on educative projects, it will further sharpen his intelligence. Paradoxically, both parents and society are suppressing the intellect of a child rather than help it to flourish. It has been repeatedly proven that for a multifaceted growth of a child, he needs exposure to not only educative projects but to other activities too such as sports, arts and craft.
To sum up with, society and parents push to a child to take part in only educative activities are hampering the development of a child, both physical as well as psychological. a rather more holistic approach should be adopted in upbringing of one’s offspring
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ld and is detrimental for both physical as well as his intellectual growth. This essay sha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merits of such unidirectional approach. Indulging in only educa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...vities or any physical activity are 70% more healthier and are resistant to various diseases. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nto a healthier and brainier adult. In addition to physical activities, part...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...e development of a child, both physical as well as psychological. a rather more holistic a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...both physical as well as psychological. a rather more holistic approach should be...
^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in upbringing of one's offspring
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25696594427 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13388554063 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523219814241 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6357435981 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0933773536737 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356676426478 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409204776455 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654715425555 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340087594891 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.