Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast

Essay topics:

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Humans are utilising natural resources at a rate that, it would be difficult for them to exist after certain years in absence of these resources such as water, coal, if recycling is not considered at present. This essay agrees that government ought to make laws so that people would give preference to recycling, reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.

First and foremost, due to lack of sense of individual responsibility, people do not care about proper waste recycling methods. Furthermore, government can bring laws and strict guidelines in notice of these people so that they abide by these regulations, and take initiatives to reduce the waste from their homes such as reutilise the water flowing from the kitchen after utensils washing, for watering the plants. For instance, government has put automated meters in Norway in 2017 to check the water supply and its reutilization which resulted in sharp decline of water-wastage by 30 per cent in a year.

Secondly, fear of paying fine to authorities can motivate reluctant people to work on novel recycling procedures. These people would reuse the waste things at home such as plastic bottles to grow plants, broken glasses for decoration, to maintain their reputation in society without any legal charges. For example, fine collection of only Rs. 2/- per plastic bottle from any home by sweepers has curbed the plastic-waste by two-fold in Madhya Pradesh in 2018 which was an achievement for local government bodies.

In conclusion, although recycling of waste is crucial, people do not consider it as a noble deed. So government must pose some laws, rules and regulations to inspire citizens to minimise the waste from their home by recycling.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84141878545 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617857142857 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5476855604 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.9 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327481946576 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128925426379 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545945557253 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197649284543 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555806324473 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.