Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning a practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?
Education is the fundamental right of every citizen across the world. The governing body has made education as a paramount factor to develop the world. It is duly noted that the country with better educational infrastructure has seen tremendous growth in an economy when compared to other nations. Nevertheless, it is imperative to make the education balance between practical application and learning theories which is being discussed in the below paragraphs.
The professional career which involves practical learning experience in their curriculum, subsequently makes the learning experience prosperous. Firstly, the health care education for example doctors and nurses, go through substantial factful learning in initial semester followed by dexterous experience on bodies and internship training under guided supervision, not only makes them adroit but also skilful in handling difficult situations.
Secondly, no one undermines the immense operations of Fire Fighters and Army, who perform their duties marvellously to safeguard the common population. Along with the theoretical knowledge, they are trained rigorously, in an uneasy situation to make them analyse, how to think quickly and take necessary action.
On the contrary, this hands-on experience is somewhat lacking in the engineering program. The rot learning and passing the exams with very little exposure towards on-site experience makes the pupil challenging to perform in a live situation to provide a definite solution. It is quite evident that the administrators have realised this situation and thereby now it is being made compulsory for all engineers to do internships as a part of academics.
Therefore, it is inevitable that, if the proper balance needs to be maintained between the practical learning and factful learning in any educational body, it will undermine their capabilities with mundane knowledge leading to frail in the competent society.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'performing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: performing
... experience makes the pupil challenging to perform in a live situation to provide a defini...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73958333333 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08684851864 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631944444444 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0565613779 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161179078094 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554819916144 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493348229437 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875837407419 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532226196345 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'performing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: performing
... experience makes the pupil challenging to perform in a live situation to provide a defini...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73958333333 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08684851864 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631944444444 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0565613779 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161179078094 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554819916144 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493348229437 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875837407419 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532226196345 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.