Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that, theoretical knowledge has been seen as more noteworthy than learning practical skills in our formal educational system. I completely agree with this statement that devoting a great deal of time for pure knowledge is not sufficient.
Education has been very obsessed with the acquisition of knowledge for years. Most primary and higher education routines are academic-oriented, which is often structured into subject areas and courses, defined in terms of information chunks. Consequently, many pupils often struggle with memorizing and learning excessive theoretical contents that they would rather their time are spent on mastery of skills. For example, as a statistics student, I prefer to acquire programming competencies in order to my future occupation would be guaranteed in advance. I believe that the division of the potential crafts and skills and the theoretical literacy-based abilities must build in every education career to enhance proficiencies.
On the other hand, when it comes to be in a technical environment besides cognitive development, individuals will be able to accommodate their qualified needs better. What is more, by having sufficient experience on practical abilities, there would be no low self-confidence or motivation to be involved in an occupation. In other words, in spite of possessing a higher education degree many employers will be looking for the most talented and experienced applicants. So, the more learning skills leave to lesser attention, the more unattainable skill workers. Finally, there is a link between cognitive development and practical learning which lead to be more sustainable in mind.
In conclusion, I would argue that assigning pure acquirement exclusive of applied abilities can tend to more dysfunctional issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... on practical abilities, there would be no low self-confidence or motivation to be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, if, look, so, for example, in conclusion, in other words, in spite of, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65201465201 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2847075201 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622710622711 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6290290051 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.692307692 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114645981113 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420515406061 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445975981162 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654481844952 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425838718781 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.