Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion
Presently, due to the swelling rate of criminal offenses, what measures need to taken on offenders has risen into prominence in many places around the world. However, it is a controversial topic introducing heavy debate concerns finding indelible and sustainable ways to implement on prisoners. While there has been a growing body of opinion in favor of giving the longer prison sentences, others are in consummate discord with it and argues that there are other optimal strategies to decrease crime. I wholeheartedly concur with latter viewpoint as it would be plausible to give not only shorter prison sentences but also rehabilitate criminals while in prison.
To my perception, one evident advantage to rehabilitating offenders while assigning them short prison sentences is changing their mind set for their whole life. Governments ought to train them with some skills, considering the fact that they can earn their bread after getting released from prison. A statistic was recently released demonstrating that offenders getting some vocational training neither behave in unacceptable way after serving prison nor re-offend again. Eventually, this would lead to a stable society where every member can live without the fear of being a victim. Thus, the plausibility of this strategy is crystal clear.
However, on the other hand, there is a human argument favoring long captivity periods for criminals in order to deter crime in the foreseeable future. It is claimed that it would reduce the likelihood of committing crime by same criminals when they go outside in the community. Moreover, it will set an example for the others focusing on the fact that they have to spend their entire lives in jail if they do anything wrong. Thorough research was conducted by Harvard University, UK, using online survey with a sample size of 1000 Indians spanning different age groups and found that they fear to commit crimes such as murder which has long prison sentence for criminals. Therefore, it is good way to deter people to indulge themselves in wrong doings.
Following this look, although long prison sentences can diminish the criminal activities up to some extent, I opine that it is the rehabilitation that works best for criminals as well as for the societal well-being. Hence, the essentialty of rehabilitation centers is commendable all over the world with the intention of educating offenders
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[5]
Message: Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
...riminal offenses, what measures need to taken on offenders has risen into prominence ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ewpoint as it would be plausible to give not only shorter prison sentences but al...
^^
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tal clear. However, on the other hand, there is a human argument favoring long ...
^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ietal well-being. Hence, the essentialty of rehabilitation centers is commendable...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25194805195 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8542181016 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615584415584 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9867083378 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.375 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205729140928 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601359191508 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537088609825 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114157564793 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539403289193 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.