Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people believe that one should always have those friends who accord with their viewpoints. However, others opine that one should make those friends who have a disagreement with their thoughts. Both sides have their pros and cons depending on the situation. In this essay, I will discuss both the opinions and will give my own opinion.
Firstly, when individuals make friends they look for like-minded persons who share similar interests such as choices related to food, sports, education, and so on. As they have a common liking for things, their bonding is much stronger. So, they understand each other very well and make better choices together. For example, when they go for shopping with these kinds of friends, together they can buy things in less time. If both the friends have different thought patterns, they may not be able to do shopping in a short span of time and they may end up their time in conflict.
Secondly, one should have a friendship with those who have diverse opinions as they help in making good decisions in life. Discord can throw light on those aspects of life you are unaware of and this can save you from unknown complications in life. For instance, while buying a laptop I asked opinion from my all friends who have a good bonding with me and also got advice from the friend who has different mindset after analyzing I found that viewpoint of later was a good one as it helped me tacking a sagacious decision for buying a perfect device. Had I not gone through his differing suggestion, I might have wasted my money on the wrong choice.
In conclusion, there are definitely benefits of having friends who share the same values and opinions as us. But it is equally important to have those friends who share a different perspective than us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to tack' or 'tack'.
Suggestion: to tack; tack
...of later was a good one as it helped me tacking a sagacious decision for buying a perfe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... share a different perspective than us.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76451612903 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4616961573 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6841541644 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352546113955 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132257799874 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977626607688 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238381955614 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100982769548 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.