Some people think that new technologies benefits the life of workers whereas some deny the statement.
There is no denying that technological advancement has made life easier in many fields. It is often argued that many people prefer to use these technologies to make their regular chores efficient, whilst others disagree with the statement and find the idea less effective. This essay agrees with the former part of the argument. The essay will discuss both point of views in detail.
On one side, those who believe that modern technology can add disadvantages to their work, might argue that humans become more isolated from society.This is because mankind do not get opportunity to interact with each other as most of the processes are automated by the industrial mechanics. Moreover, capability of honing interpersonal skills also reduces. As a result, people do not feel confident to face others and be efficient in finding work. For example, people who lack confidence do bad in their interviews.
On the contrast, technology is significant for people to remember and do their tasks efficiently and in a short span of time. Their quick contribution towards organisational goals offers them enough space to be recognised by the employer as an exceptional talent. In addition, many companies prefer to employee candidates who have command on computers to be more productive. Henceforth, this essay agrees that technology benefits the life of workers. For instance, knowledge of handling laptop and learning to operate on various softwares, a person increases his chance of being employed in an institute as they understand how to drive work in a faster pace.
In conclusion, although implementing technology in daily work has several advantages, such as being more productive and fast in the competitive world, some still feel that this phenomenon leads to lack of confidence and depletes the networking skills. However, as long as we are careful to keep in mind the human interaction at work, the technological benefits are clearly positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...umans become more isolated from society.This is because mankind do not get opportuni...
^^^^
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and how to drive work in a faster pace. In conclusion, although implementing tec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26282051282 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97871448341 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2122336556 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161694235527 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518843277188 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555762456968 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931564175368 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322433384928 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.