Subjects like arts, music and drama are more important than other school subjects and therefore should be give more time in the calendar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Presently, the issue of weight-age of different subjects in the school curriculum has risen into prominence in many places around the world. However, it is a controversial topic introducing heavy debate concerns the addition of more artistic subjects. That is why, there has been a growing body of opinion in favor of scheduling more time for subjects of music, art, and drama in the calendar year of educational institutes. I wholeheartedly concur with this school of thought because more exposure to artistic subjects would not only help students to express their emotions easily but also enable them to earn money in their adulthood.
Unquestionably, more time spent on the art curriculum in schools would ensure that children are able to convey their emotions through art activities, for example, to draw a painting, to sing a song, or play a role in a drama. A statistic was recently released demonstrating the fact that art subjects stimulate critical thinking at a young age, enabling them to understand different perspectives of life. Eventually, pupils learn to analyze what they are feeling and how to express it using art.
Let us not forget either that more focus on these subjects might help students to adopt it as a profession in their future lives. As competition in other academic subjects is stiff, students find it excruciating to find a job related to that study. On the contrary, areas namely music, art or dance offer a variety of choices to get in for earning a decent amount of money. Thorough research has been conducted by Harvard University, the UK in 2015 using an online survey with a sample size of more than 1000 Indians spanning different age groups and found that they did not get jobs on the basis of academic subjects, thus, adopting their art interest as their professions. Thus, the plausibility of more focus on artistic subjects in schools is clear.
Following this look, even though other academic subjects such as math and science play a vital role in the academic areas, schools ought to assign more periods on subjects of art. If authorities invested more in these crucial subjects of arts, students would not perceive going to school as a boring routine.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, thus, for example, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76991285278 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6836906176 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.785714286 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33282079466 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119775272619 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679785996224 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214954288361 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383674368991 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.