Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Nowadays, many tourists from all around the world are traveling to remote places with harsh weather conditions such as deserts or the South Pole. This adventure would carry lots of advantages that might encourage anybody to plan for, alongside there are some fears and drawbacks that can hinder anybody from even think about it.
One of the most fabulous features of deserts and polar regions is the beautiful sightseeing. The extended dunes and the attractive icebergs are undoubtedly amazing. It would be a great experience as well to watch animals such as gazelles, camels, penguins, and seals in their original habitats. Besides, visiting such places would teach anybody how to be self-reliable and independent, especially it might be challenging to rely only on your inventory or backpack supplies.
On the other hand, the most worrying disadvantage of being there is not only risky landscapes but also the danger of facing extreme hot or cold weather. From moving sands to slippery glaciers, it is hard to predict where you should put your feet. Besides, the visitor should be aware of forecasts alarms to avoid burning sandstorms or freezing blizzards. Prolonged exposure to hot sunlight can lead to dehydration and heat strokes or vital organs' malfunction in case of extreme cold. It must be difficult to provide first aid in such horrible circumstances as well.
Nocturnal canines, snakes, scorpions, and the polar bears could be an additional threat to anybody thinking about being in such places. Someone with zero experience would put his life on the edge if he would like to practice camping there.
To summarize, visiting places with unusual weather conditions would be very appealing and adventurous for some tourists. Yet, precautions and risks to be considered, along with the guidance of a local helper to avoid life-threatening surroundings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'relying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: relying
...ent, especially it might be challenging to rely only on your inventory or backpack supp...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'risks being'.
Suggestion: risks being
...for some tourists. Yet, precautions and risks to be considered, along with the guidance of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, well, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27090301003 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83535122402 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632107023411 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6632278835 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165902490759 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516279323735 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628912260518 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897814797455 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041143516205 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.