Today, younger and older generations are in the same workplace. Does the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is an upsurge in the way workplaces employ different age groups, be it younger or older individuals. Although this notion has few demerits, there are also several benefits such as a company’s overall productivity and exchange of knowledge among the different age groups.
Admittedly, there are some disadvantages in a working model where the elderly and the youth work in a convergent manner. Unlike the younger employees, who are always energetic and innovative, older people lack in enthusiasm and the pace they complete their work in, thanks to their age. For example, many organizations today are initiating programs among its employees to eradicate the factors engendering the disparity between its different groups of employees. Hence, it is evident that a company has to take extra measures, when it comes to increasing the spontaneity and productivity of its employees.
Nevertheless, despite the drawbacks mentioned above, there are a myriad of merits for a workplace to have employees work collectively, irrespective of their age. One of the most preponderant benefit is the ability with which all the employees are flexible to adapt and learn from each other. In other words, young employees can learn from the experiences and knowledge shared by their older counterparts. Similarly, the enthusiasm demonstrated by the younger employees can encourage the older people to be more proactive while working. Needless to say, a workplace with employees of different ages is efficacious to both the company and its employees.
In conclusion, while different age groups face minor challenges when they work together, the benefits such as instilling knowledge and motivation in each other is believed to be an indispensable factor in a company’s growth. It is hoped that this trend continues in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | ELJOJEEVAN | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | likiyash | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | Khiem Duy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | sexd.hdj@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | sexd.hdj@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Should children attend nursery school prior to primary school? Is it a positive or a negative development? 84
- The best way to reduce crime among young people is to teach parents good parenting skills To what extent do you agree with this statement Give your own opinion and examples 74
- Q .Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults. Why is this ? is it a positive or negative development ? 84
- The recent popularity of online shopping will result in the end of high street shops To wt extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Write a letter to request annual leave for marriage in professional way to MD 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a convergent manner" with adverb for "convergent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...el where the elderly and the youth work in a convergent manner. Unlike the younger employees, who are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 66, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... drawbacks mentioned above, there are a myriad of merits for a workplace to have emplo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, still, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4406779661 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17318555691 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4816870301 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.461538462 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0854681330077 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323467046885 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407941365466 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516612855143 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321632303883 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.