Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is necessary to be together during the pandemic situations so that the entire world can be safe again. If often recommended that the developed countries must help the third world war nations during any calamities so that human life is saved. That’s how the other provinces can stand again to restart their life. I agree with the notion and will explain further why they should help others.
Firstly, these underdeveloped countries do not have enough medical supplies to handle the disaster. In other words, the nations who have excellent facilities should come forward to help them on humane grounds. Moreover, they can help them by sending their doctors or medical staff to take care of the situation. For example, during COVID- 19 pandemics The USA, had given 100 ventilators to India, since in a short time frame they will not be able to build new and in the meanwhile, India will cope-up with the circumstances. Hence, such an act of kindness will save many lives.
Secondly, the poor country will be able to flourish if they get support from others. However, the wealthy nation will be remembered for the help provided and when the need arises for them the other nation takes stand for them. Furthermore, the treaty is signed that they will be loyal towards the country which had helped them when they were in tremendous need. For instance, China keeps helping Pakistan to develop their nation and for exchange, they support each other in war against others and for trade as well.
In conclusion, if wealthy provinces offer help during disasters will be remembered for the kind act as well as the loyalty alleviates and which becomes helpful when the need arises.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90526315789 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43343894837 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582456140351 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6909276793 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0714285714 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132493562974 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510797383139 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389488962145 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905799777389 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021742888015 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.