While some people consider global warming to be the most pressing environmental problem which we have at the moment, others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world. Discuss both sides and give your opinion?
In the ever expanding commercial world, humans have over exploited the natural resources to their material comforts. This has lead to extensive pressure on this green planet. Thus, a recent phenomenon of rising earth’s temperature is among most debatable topic around the globe as per certain groups. Whilst others have the opinion that cutting of forest cover has enormous ecological impact. This essay will discuss both the concerns and state the opinion why global warming can cause irreversible damage.
Firstly, reckless burning of fossil fuels in the name of development and extremely rising greenhouse emission levels has lead to jump in global temperature. Therefore, its repercussions can be felt, when we listen to the scientists theory of melting arctic ice. This will definitely engross land mass and put humanity living near coastal areas in jeopardy. People will loose their homes and livelihood and catastrophe may strike. For instance, a recent research by science magazine concluded if we emit green house gases at the same rate, in next one decade 10 centimeters of the land will be submerged under water.
On the other hand, unplanned cutting of green cover for infrastructure growth or to satisfy our materialistic demands can aggravate to rapid soil erosion. As the forest cover will deplete, it will hamper the food chain. Food scarcity and unavailability of nutrition for masses will bring crisis. Nations with geographical disadvantage will suffer the most. For instance, in Syria, deforestation of green pastures for creating urban spaces has lead to financial in debtness due to lack in production of major staple crops.
To summarize, afforestation and keeping environmental checks with legal recourse, we can still cover up the harmful impact of cutting forest covers, but consequences of global warming may not be revised in long run and can have a major impact on development goals of many countries and the true impact of this has yet to be ascertained.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...ions can be felt, when we listen to the scientists theory of melting arctic ice. This will...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... coastal areas in jeopardy. People will loose their homes and livelihood and catastro...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...d catastrophe may strike. For instance, a recent research by science magazine concluded if we emi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27358490566 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85794391823 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635220125786 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1185692916 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173116038594 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481444709049 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488203246446 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104997794445 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493962287718 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.