You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.
Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
Do you agree or disagree?
You should write at least 250 words.
Economic differences in between countries are creating a rift in the employment sector. Due to which, people tend to search for better opportunities, and readily migrate to the location of such possibility. In my opinion, this is a generic understanding amongst the working class, and is implemented worldwide.
The implications of working in an indigent country might not provide the necessary growth expected by the people from engineering or medicine background. It would be stagnant and redundant in the long run in terms of money and power. For instance, a person working for 15-20 years in the government, because of a steady income, no-risk job, employment guarantee and benefits, would fulfill the requirements till his retirement without any aspirations or ambitions to move up the professional ladder. Even if he or she aims to, the politics within that space would not let them.
On the other side of the coin, there are ways in which you can enhance your career and grab the window of opportunity. It is only sane that, people choose a properous country after spending a minimum amount of time in the home country. This is basically the case for young aspirants pursuing brilliant careers in IT sector or any field for that matter. For example, a working class employee spends an x amount of time in his company, but is presented with an option of moving up in the organisational chart in some other country. To that individual it is a once in a lifetime occassion and would definitely want to grab it right away as it is going to help his aspirations as well as be financially settled.
In conclusion, one of the reasons for migrating to a better location is that you are exposed to new concepts and notions which help in your executive life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86378737542 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89441424142 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58803986711 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7529993744 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117340439909 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406900515695 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043752475701 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654062423498 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257522902825 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.