7. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The way people dress is a good indication of his or her personality or character.
It is axiomatic that personality is one of the vital elements of people’s behavior. Some people say that recognizing an individual’s behavior should be attributed to the cloth that they wear, while others say that considering just dress up is not a good idea to show a person’s temper. Were I forced to choose, I would prefer to opt for the latter point of view rather than the former one. My reasons are substantiated in the subsequent paragraph.
The first reason worth mentioning is that although poor people drees up low-quality cloth, they might have a nice character. To clarify, the historical events have shown that there have been many economically weak people and even bankrupted folk even had had better manner among other people which wore neat cloth and suits, such as helping bravely toward people in an economic depression, floods, droughts, earth quick before governors showed a reaction. For example, I have read an article in the local newspaper that after world war two had been finished, Japanese people who did not have the government faced problems. In this vein, the majority of Japanese were dressing up messy cloth when they were needy, disturbed. As a result, their cloth has not been indicated their character.
Another key point that makes me holds this belief is that many people have not been allowed to wear whatever they want in some countries, so it does not mean that all of them have the same character since each person has especial moral and physical features. Indeed, many dictator governments have put pressure on their citizen so as to unify them and control. Therefore, in such a circumstance, either people have no right freely to dress up different colorful cloth or they have to wear the routine costume. Consequently, if society who wear costume equally. For instance, North Korea located near china has administrated by a superior minister who is a member of Jon dynasty. North Korean have no option to were jeans and suits, to name but a few. Also, their face is analogous to each other. we obviously cannot say something that they have alike identity with regard to their similar face and dress.
To sum up, it is impossible to understating people’s nature by seeing their shirts, shoes, and trousers. I believe that people’s morale and personality are not recognizable things that people can identify easily by their costumes. This is because their appearance cannot show a good frame of identity and because people whose character is not the same in some countries have to wear the same clothes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...ak people and even bankrupted folk even had had better manner among other people which ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has not been indicated their character. Another key point that makes me holds th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ents have put pressure on their citizen so as to unify them and control. Therefore, in s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 797, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... their face is analogous to each other. we obviously cannot say something that the...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gard to their similar face and dress. To sum up, it is impossible to understat...
^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'understate'?
Suggestion: understate
...ss. To sum up, it is impossible to understating people’s nature by seeing their shirts,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96976744186 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65246907843 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.877231628 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.85 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274177285262 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911595805085 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122524892871 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202868439487 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100635478621 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.