Agree/ Disagree
People are curious creatures. So, to satisfy their curiosity, people started to develop and eventually invented schools and universities to enable everyone to get education. Despite the fact that a lot of people believe that learning and remembering information is the most important part of education, I am convinced that the ability to understand the Ideas and concepts is more important than the ability to just remember facts.
To begin with, the ability to remember facts is really useless nowadays. The reason for it is that we have invented a lot of things to record, storage and proceed the information. As a result, we do not have to remember everything, which is basically impossible. We can record all useful information on a computer and forget about it until we need it again. The best example for it is work. Even economists, architects, engineers and programmers do not have to remember all formulas and commands. The main ability they are required to have is the understanding how to use the information, such as formulas and programs to get the result.
The second reason why it is more important to understand concepts and ideals is that it would allow people to understand how everything works. With a huge amount of information, which is not connected to each other people could not do anything, and only the ability to understand concepts could help to connect all these facts and create the whole picture. For instance, when I had to learn trigonometrical formulas to pass the exam, I could not remember them, because I tried to just remember them, without understanding how, when and why we have to use them. However, when my friend explained to me why we need these formulas and how they were invented, I succeeded in remembering them and passed the exam.
To sum up, there is no doubt that possibility to understand is more useful for students than the ability to learn facts. The ability to remember information is not valuable nowadays, as we can record and keep information easily. Additionally, the understanding of concepts and ideas allows to connect and proceed the information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 291, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'connecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: connecting
...erstanding of concepts and ideas allows to connect and proceed the information.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, really, second, so, as for, as to, for instance, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98873239437 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93432172728 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459154929577 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1387792017 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.176470588 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.