Agree or disagree? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that people lived more easier than nowadays or people live comfortable in comparison past people. I agree with the first perspective for some justifications. I think that technology have important role in the life right now. Also some other people have opinion they speculate that cities smaller than right now and there is no busyness for people and for life. I deliberate that population is important factor in world and society, insomuch society would enhance every day.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that technology. Nowadays, we have cell phone, internet and high tech tools about anything. Not only internet is so pleasant for people but also we cannot accomplish without internet any working. But I think that children need to care interaction internet yet. Because internet has important role in growing of children or society, for this reason governments has specific supervision for this act. Bad anything rapidly distributes in social network and parents must watch out versus social network.
Another equally salient point of in corroborating my stance is loyalty. In the past, cities were smaller than right now and people could go to the everywhere in the city and they visited relatives more and more nowadays. My grandparents said to me about past that relatives known about other relatives but we don’t know about cousins or uncles. It can be so icky for families and societies, because there was loyalty in the past but today there is not. I indeed hope that people are been happy and honest together.
Admittedly, increasing of population can be most major reason in this subject. To put this in perspective, increasing of population is a matter of concern in many societies. We destroy national parks, lands and etc. if anything; we don’t have sufficient clean air for breathing. I read an article about earth two days ago, in this article had written about life future. In fact, we don’t have enough land for cultivation and agriculture for living. As a result scientists seek about other planet for living. Therefore, we should watch out more than past for living.
To put it all in nutshell, I reflect that old people lived easier and comfortable than nowadays. Maybe we have technology and doing is easier than past for instance journey or anything, but generally old people have tranquility and we should care about our self and future life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ablished beyond doubt that people lived more easier than nowadays or people live comfortabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e important role in the life right now. Also some other people have opinion they spe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...eties. We destroy national parks, lands and etc. if anything; we don't have suffici...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld care about our self and future life.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in fact, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05185185185 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69283457061 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528395061728 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3421911746 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6923076923 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5769230769 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80769230769 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146929127495 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374130675686 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463115003212 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881216862506 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465407868989 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.