Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
One of the most significant milestones in ourlives is our realtions with other people and the number of people which we choose to spend our time with. Undoubtledly, these people can have many effects on our lives and due to this fact, there are some controversial questions which ofren raised in relation this issue. Some people are inclined toward the fact that ability of maintain friendship with a small number of people over long period of time is more important for happiness while others look at this issue through a different lens. I personally condent that having fewer friends can help us to happier and in the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most noticeable facts around this choice.
The first exquisite point is that when we are in touch with our friends over a long period of time, we will have the chance to find out more about each other and this can enable us to be happier. Accordingly, when we designate myriads of time with our friends, we will become familiar about the mutual interests between us and this fact can help us to fulfill our needs. In this case, when the number of friends are less, we can easily find their interests which is more identical to ours. For example, I have this chance to know two of my friends from elementry school, over this 10 years, I could find out that me and my friends are passionate about mountain climbing and we would not like to tolerate people who are jelous. Therefore, becasue of this knowledge, we go mountain climbing every week and every one try to respect other characteristics of our three members group. Consequently, I our mountain climbing events we have a lot of fun and this example can comprehensively show the benefit of maintaining friendship for a long period of time to feel more happy.
Another equally significant point is that having small number of friends will enable us to help them in severe situations and by helping them, we can satisfy our friends and ourselves. When we choose to maintain our friendships with small number of people for a long period of time, we can know more about the background of our friends and in the severe situations we can help our friends more conviniently. For example, I knew that one of my friends have financial problems recently because his father become bankrupt. In this situation because of my information about this family, I could help him with giving him some money. That is how I felt more happy to help my friend and solve his finantial problem. Unfortunately, I could not help many friends in this way if i have more friends.
All in all, maintaining fewer friendships with small number of people over a long period of time will enable us to increase our knowledge our mutual intrests and help them in severe situations which can have a significan effect on our happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 400, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...hat ability of maintain friendship with a small number of people over long period of time is more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...with a small number of people over long period of time is more important for happiness while o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 542, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... this issue through a different lens. I personally condent that having fewer friends can help us t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e in touch with our friends over a long period of time, we will have the chance to find out mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nd we would not like to tolerate people who are jelous. Therefore, becasue of this know...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1037, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...it of maintaining friendship for a long period of time to feel more happy. Another equally ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... with small number of people for a long period of time, we can know more about the background ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...with small number of people over a long period of time will enable us to increase our knowledg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 82.0 43.0788530466 190% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72267206478 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61142155338 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414979757085 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4102203072 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.235294118 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0588235294 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26369129672 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111520103629 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952663937516 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202863501637 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557069698148 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.1575268817 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.