Agree or disagree? One can learn about a person from the books and movies that the person likes.
Learning about a person's personality is the most important thing to do when we first meet with others. Some people said that it is a good method to learn about a person from the books and movies that the person likes. In my opinion, I personally do not agree with this statement.
To begin with, we will not be able to understand others' actual personality if we learn from books or movies they like. To be more specific, books and movies are just some interest that people like to do. We might be able to figure out others' interest, but I do not think that we can actually know about others in depth. For example, if a person likes to read lots of books about fighting, does that means he or she is very active and always cause troubles? I really enjoy reading and watching action books and films, but the reason why I like this genre is just that I appreciate the way how actors and arthurs describe and act out these moves. I can really learn a lot from them. However, I never actually fight with someone before. As a result, I think that it is not a good idea to learn about a person from the movies or books that the person likes.
In addition, people's interest will shift over times but our fundamental personality will never change. To be more specific, people often enjoy different kinds of things at a different age. They might enjoy playing sports when they were a kid and find out that researching is extremely interesting when they grow up. However, a person's personality will never change. For example, my grandparents told me that my mom is not a patient person. She never wanted to spend any time waiting for other people. Likewise, I found out that her personality had never changed after so many years. Even until now, she is still not a very patient person. Therefore, because of this reason, I think that a person's interest and personality is a totally different thing. Thus, how can we understand a person's fundamental personality by learning their interest that is changing all the time?
Undoubtedly, some people may agree with this statement because they think that this is the most efficient way to learn about people. However, books and movies cannot reflect a person actual personality. The movies or books they like to watch might just be an interest. As a result, I do not think that we can understand others' personality fundamentally if we only learn from the movies or books they like.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
Learning about a persons personality is the most important thing...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...teresting when they grow up. However, a persons personality will never change. For exam...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... because of this reason, I think that a persons interest and personality is a totally d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, likewise, may, really, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61111111111 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49953699416 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43287037037 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2149059348 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.68 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.28 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.48 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455439767088 0.236089414692 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160778657539 0.076458572812 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143143665132 0.0737576698707 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350785871343 0.150856017488 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962455305374 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.53 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.