To be successful at school or at work, we most be creative.
In today's competitive world, everyone is running for success. I totally agree with the statement that we have to be creative in our work to get the desired success.
Firstly, the research says that everyone is creative but we have to use our creative power in the right way. The students should develop their thinking power, instead of running for grades. In other words, we should always appreciate students to complete their assignments with creativity. For example, One article in the newspaper says that a 12-year high school student in the USA have used green tea to research for cancer cures. I was amazed after reading this and realized that such students are interested in research projects at the early ages of their education which gives a positive signal that we are going to get a good scientist in future. Thus, teachers should encourage students to improve their thinking ability.
Secondly, creative students are successful in any field. For example, Alan Turing who was the mathematician, computer scientist. He invented the device to break German's Enigma code during the second world war. His work is really appreciated. Due to his creativity, he could decipher the hidden code and that helped to control the war between Britain and Germany which saved people's lives. Another good example is John Nash who was an American mathematician from Princeton University. His theory is known as 'Nash Equilibrium' which is used in modern economics. The John Nash was awarded as a Nobel memorable prize on his later life. Thus, creativity plays a significant role because creativity expands our perception and it improves our problem-solving skills which aids to solve the problems.
In conclusion, the success at work and school is depending on our hard work, interest, creativity, and persistence. If everyone applies the qualities above, then everyone can achieve success in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in our work to get the desired success. Firstly, the research says that everyone...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 647, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...at we are going to get a good scientist in future. Thus, teachers should encourage studen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts to improve their thinking ability. Secondly, creative students are successf...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ills which aids to solve the problems. In conclusion, the success at work and s...
^^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...clusion, the success at work and school is depending on our hard work, interest, creativity,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16286644951 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74288764067 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589576547231 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4286920116 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4210526316 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169981769584 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049770667364 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782385160041 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135354026635 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888156753833 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.