Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
At present the work ratio and speedy nature of intricate works are so huge that if anyone fails to get embellishment in his work, he eventually is to be deemed as an inefficient person. However it is not his fault, it is seen as the human nature and others surrounding pressures as reason of failure. This is why I do believe that you can do well if you have a focus on limited works. Therefore, I will substantiate the above statement in the positive direction with proper logic.
To embark on, propensity is the main issue in this case to discern the view of why people fail to perform well in case of overload works. To illustrate more, I will share my experience. When I was a 1st year student of college in 12th class, we were taught math, physics and chemistry. But my felicitation and interest were only based on mathematics. As a result, what one can hope from this jumble situation? No doubt student will not cut a good figure in the exam. Likewise, I also got poor grades in all subjects as I could not use my attention in mathematics well. In the long run, my propensity and wish to perform math well went in vain. Basically such mixture of learning system spoils the student's mentality to learn his predilection based subject which eventually yields poor performance in his career. Not only me, but also my friends who were boss in physics in 12th class, they lost their last ended interest in physics due to the over pressure of all subjects.
Furthermore, there is a limit of brain capacity of a student to inculcate the concept of different areas of study. What I mean by this is that, every student has a space of brain upon which if he is reared, he will master it. Otherwise, he will not process different subjects into his brain. For instance, my friend was weak in talent. Conversely he was adamant to learn agriculture study. In this respect, what deprecation is that he was always captured by his tuition class and college classes. In effect he could not take up all pressure into his mind. Finally his brain power was at a stake and he left study for two years. Therefore it is crystal clear like water that if a student were to press lot of things, he would lose efficiency for not his capacity, rather his brain processing area.
Last but not least, most of the times, students and job holder don't get enough time to accomplish lot of duties. In effect of pressure from boss or teachers impact on the others works. For example, I am working in a private firm where every day I have to monitor lot of files. In the office time, I have no time to associate others people, even if I can't recheck files after completing work. So, in last three days, I made three wrongs in three files. In this consideration, I have full aplomb, if office gives me one timed work, I will perform that very effectively.So, If I were a boss of institutions, I will focus at first in the efficiency of a worker, and then arrange work-schedule.
To wrap it up, it is very difficult to provide a persuasive decision in this open ended question. Although some may oppose my purview, it is lucid to understand why man fails to yield result if case of overworks. That's why I do believe each and every logic clearly substantiates the main theme of the statement in the positive direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... to be deemed as an inefficient person. However it is not his fault, it is seen as the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...h mixture of learning system spoils the students mentality to learn his predilection bas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 191, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...student has a space of brain upon which if he is reared, he will master it. Otherw...
^^
Line 9, column 337, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...instance, my friend was weak in talent. Conversely he was adamant to learn agriculture stu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 557, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...not take up all pressure into his mind. Finally his brain power was at a stake and he l...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 629, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... stake and he left study for two years. Therefore it is crystal clear like water that if ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t of the times, students and job holder dont get enough time to accomplish lot of du...
^^^^
Line 13, column 351, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e to associate others people, even if I cant recheck files after completing work. So...
^^^^
Line 13, column 568, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...k, I will perform that very effectively.So, If I were a boss of institutions, I wi...
^^
Line 17, column 214, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...s to yield result if case of overworks. Thats why I do believe each and every logic c...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he statement in the positive direction.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i mean, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2710.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 597.0 407.700716846 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53936348409 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64392400394 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 307.0 212.727598566 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514237855946 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 860.4 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1807367526 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6875 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.65625 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09375 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.07427074894 0.236089414692 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0190224369388 0.076458572812 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380524078371 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0404686225258 0.150856017488 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291616719371 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.