Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
As people could not have an experience living in the past days, they can not imagine at all how happy they have being now comparing with the past time. All of these happiness benefit from the developments of the world.
First of all, it is grateful that most of us could have enough food to eat today. Due to the wars and natural disasters, many people were in hungry and kept in poverty in early 20th. When my grandfather was young, after World War 2 and following natural disaster, it came to be a big short of food at that time. There was no enough food supplying in the market so people had to buy food rely on tickets. The food was in a big loss, so people had to replace main food by the others, such as sweat potatoes, which were cheap and growing easily. My grandfather usually had 2 meals per day, and the only one dish supplied with rice was sour tofu. What's more, one tofu could be divided into 7 parts and eaten by 7 days. After that my grandfather recalls his memories, he often says that he could be taller if he had enough food in the past days. So, to be grateful, it is happy to see most of us have enough food to eat.
Furthermore, the ways of entertainments become more than before, which could be accessed easily by most of people than before. Thanks to the development of technology, the games are growing from physical crafts to video games, even virtual reality games now. In the past times, people indeed had games, but most of them were limited by conditions and time, such as Chess, if you would like to play Chess, you had to make appointment with friends and it would cost many extra time. But nowadays, people can access in virtual world with their friend almost in anytime they want, just connect to Internet, and it would not cost to much. Without this, there are many other entertainments you can choose which make you feel happy easily.
As I am concerned, people have more reasons to fell happy than they have ever been before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... they have being now comparing with the past time. All of these happiness benefit from th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this happiness' or 'these happinesses'?
Suggestion: this happiness; these happinesses
...ow comparing with the past time. All of these happiness benefit from the developments of the wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... dish supplied with rice was sour tofu. Whats more, one tofu could be divided into 7 ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., one tofu could be divided into 7 parts and eaten by 7 days. After that my grand...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...fore, which could be accessed easily by most of people than before. Thanks to the development ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople indeed had games, but most of them were limited by conditions and time, suc...
^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...nect to Internet, and it would not cost to much. Without this, there are many othe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41483516484 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27257921541 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8385753625 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5294117647 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17647058824 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227344851462 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738126366911 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053256490431 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152923100047 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405267968802 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 58.1214874552 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.