Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past

Essay topics:

Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.

In this hectic life, being happy or please plays pivotal roles in peoples' lives. Being pleased helps people receive more energy and have an impetuous to do their activity. While some people believe that people are joyful today as well as they were in the past, others think that due to rapid change in people's lives, they are less satisfied than ancient periods. I concur with the latter assertion. I will elaborate on some reasons in favor of my claims in the following article.
First and foremost, due to the world’s fast-changing, people are less concentrated in today’s lives than in the past. Generally speaking, modern lives consists of different aspects which require paying attention to every detail of them to do community and family responsibility and doing theses various duties makes people busier and, thereby, less happy. On the other hand, past lives were naïve and superficial. To clarify more, in modern lives, people are engaged with various responsibilities. For example, I can remember that when I was a student in college, I had to do my educational assignments and be up to date besides my family and community tasks such as caring parents, pets, going to participate in some organizations like environmental preservation institutions Etc. On the contrary, in the past lives, the people had simple lives so that they could focus on their lives efficiently, and thereby, they were happier than today. For instance, in the past, people gathering in an extended family, and everyone has their duty, and as a result, their family and community are divided equally among them. Moreover, their lives were stable and steady which did not have any advanced educational system and developed communities.
Another reason which is worthwhile to mention is that, due to the high speed of modern life-changing, peoples have more mental peace problems as compared to unsophisticated past lives. To explain more, today's people have to compete every day to earn their basic life needs, making people have more distress and anxiety than simple past lives. Needless to say that, information technology alter people' life drastically, and therefore, people have to obtain recent and up-to-date information to succeed in their works and business. For example, there are different cell-company all over the world which doing market research to recognize customers interest to be prosperous in their business. Accordingly, these companies hire many workers and engineers, so they have to be up-date to obtain more information from their surrounding area and customer to be prosperous in their business. The more people have stress to be up-date, the more their mental health is endangered. Consequently, most of the people today are suffering from mental health problems such as anxiety, which is originated from modern life aspects.

In summary, while some people think that due to the increasing pace of modern life, people are more satisfied as compared to the past, I think this elaborated life is not helpful for peoples’ joyousness. Not only did contemporary life deteriorate peoples’ concentration, but it weakened their mental peace as well. It is strongly suggested that government executives provide some exciting and pleasurable activities for their community to improve peoples’ physical and mental health.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2809.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 530.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85307788183 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498113207547 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 887.4 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.357142126 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.130434783 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0434782609 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95652173913 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374336143714 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119752612495 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833391722735 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251483064511 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703651744334 0.0645574589148 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.