A company is going to give some money either to support arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose?
There are some moot points about whether it is better to support the environment or the art. The question of choosing the best way for supporting these issues has aroused as a subject of controversy among companies. When it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that it is better to give some money to support the environment. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that nowadays, due to increases in population, the environment needs financial support more than the previous time. To be more specific, owing to humans activity and constructions, too many trees are cut off, therefore for protecting these trees, we should invest in plats more trees. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a supervisor in the project, we obliged to cut off some trees for constructing the road consequently, taskmaster promised to plant some trees instead of these trees. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that companies should support the environment because of humans damaging activities.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that scientist asserts that the more environment support, the less disease occur. Thus, it is very crucial to keep the environment more than past time because thanks to rising the pollution, if we have not any attention, our environment will be damaged occasionally. My personal example demonstrates this reality, two days ago I watched documentation on the BBC channel. In that program, the researcher claimed that air pollution led to some chronic diseases which cause huge costs for governments. Hence companies could provide some money to support the environment and helped to decrease air pollution. My personal example shed some light to the point that corporations funding on the environment prevent many chronic diseases.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, if companies want to expense some money, it is better to support the environment. This action not only is crucial for our environment but also prevent some terrible diseases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ucial to keep the environment more than past time because thanks to rising the pollution,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...which cause huge costs for governments. Hence companies could provide some money to s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1546961326 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97739824995 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544198895028 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5138617303 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227822797931 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801198844602 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674673143463 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151596760008 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462745781025 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.