Which one of these abilities do you think is the most important for a high school teacher teaching students ages 15-18 to have?
- the ability to give students advice to plan for their future;
- the ability to find which students need help and provide them with help;
- the ability to encourage students to learn by themselves outside of the classroom
There are some moot points about the most important ability which should be taught to the high school students. These question of which is the best option for high school teachers for teaching students age 15-18 has aroused as the subject of controversy among the authorities.
Everyone has their own zeitgeist. I strongly subscribe to the viewpoint that the ability to give students advice to plane for their future is significant for high school teachers.
I have some reasons two of which will be aptly expounded hereunder.
The first reason worth to discussing here is that nowadays due to limited job opportunity students have to choose the best plan for their future career and job consequently, teachers could be the best counselor for students to draw a precious outline for their future and do everything to reach their goals. To be more specific, teachers could help students to choose the best plane for their future, If students have a good plane they can be successful in their career. As a case of the point, I vividly remember when I was high school student I decided to choose major in art history but I had a teacher who consulted me to chose mathematics because I could select more range of the field of study in the university. After that I chose mathematics and I entranced to the university in the civil engineering field. Now I am very happy for this choice because civil engineering field not only is very popular in my country but also has good job opportunity and situation, My own experience competently corroborates this idea that teaching the ability of plan for future is very important for high school students and can change their life.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned, teachers usually know the negative and the positive characteristic of students, therefore, can advise them easily in the best way. moreover, they know which plan ameliorate their apprentice and which plan can reduce their chances to be successful in the future therefore if teachers make a plane for students the probability of prosperity increase dramatically.
My personal experience demonstrates this reality. When I was a high school student I decided to found a part-time job in summer but my teachers consulted me to took a Toefl preparation class and tried to improve my English language. Consequently, I went to the Toefl class and I got my Toefl score. Five years later due to my great Toefl score, I could joint to the high ranked university. My own experience shed some light of the point that planning for future is the substantial ability for high school students.
in the nutshell, according to the above-mentioned reasons, I vehemently claim that teaching the ability for planning for the future is the significant ability which teachers can teach to high school students. This ability not only increase their chance for a future career but also lead to change their students' life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 565, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to major'
Suggestion: to major
...high school student I decided to choose major in art history but I had a teacher who ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...can advise them easily in the best way. moreover, they know which plan ameliorate their ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...tial ability for high school students. in the nutshell, according to the above-me...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2441.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94129554656 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77760604007 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427125506073 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.1625024291 48.9658058833 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.473684211 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464236328683 0.236089414692 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151243052381 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118346724236 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258171724502 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123084568121 0.0645574589148 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.