Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different than yours and they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a good idea? Use reasons and examples to support your answer.
workgroups, as we all know, for the majority of people, is the most important achievement of human beings up to now. Due to its paramount effect, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been among the top priority of sociologists. In this regard, many people believe that the advantage of working in the groups outweigh its disadvantageous. Similarly to common belief, I believe that working with even co-workers who have different ideas is beneficial both for people in the group and for the purpose they seek. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that having co-workers is favorable is related to human nature. Undoubtedly, humans are born with an instinct to be in a group, having teams by providing a community, will fulfill this need. To illustrate, these days, people do not look at their job as a task; rather, they look at them as a purpose that should be done in the best way. Therefore, having a group that people are gathered in it to do the same job will enable people to understand different viewpoints toward the issue and balance their own perspective. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, when I was younger than now, I participated in a group. Unfortunately, all points of view were different from me, but when I listen to their reasons and their explanations, I understand my notion was almost incorrect, and I should polish it. So, different ideas were useful in somehow.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the same purpose among all group members. In fact, it is impossible that people in the same group totally have the same ideas about one issue. Moreover, having consensus seems complicated at first sight. While even among various ideas, the purpose is unique, and all group members seek the same goal. Therefore, by negotiating and consulting, people can find a way that everybody has an agreement on it. Scientifically peaking, groups that negatively communicate with each other collapse three times sooner than groups, which have some consensus on the ways they try to fulfill the aim. Even though many critics challenge this idea and debate that people with the same ideas should create groups, the results of groups that have members who think differently show the other side. What would happen if group members chose different ways to get the same purpose? Indeed, constructive conflicts bring numerous advantages, such as gaining the goal through creative ways.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that co-workers with different ideas not only are beneficial for balancing the ideas but also they are advantageous for innovatively achieving the purposes of the group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Workgroups
workgroups, as we all know, for the majority of pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...he groups outweigh its disadvantageous. Similarly to common belief, I believe that workin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, while, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0652173913 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80946533403 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534782608696 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6244497334 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.304347826 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113103297344 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333507525691 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367829011784 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820798145564 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174482020874 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.