Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The society we live in represents an important part of our lives. The interaction with other people affects our behavior within a community whether we experience happiness or sorrow. Many people support the claim that friendships with a small number of people during a long-term is crucial for the happiness of the person more than the making a lot of friends easily; others would disagree. As soon as I am concern, I agree with the fact that maintaining friendships with a small range of people is much beneficial for our happiness than having numerous friends in an easy way for two essential reasons.
First, the main reason is that it would create a strong relationship. Having few friends during a long period of time will definitely solidify the friendship and build up a sort of a mutual understanding. This means that the other person (friend) understand deeply in a way that he or she can provide you happiness via numerous ways. For example, in my college days, I had only two close friends that I met in the dormitory. During the academic year, I experienced difficulties to digest some courses, so it did irritate me for a while. I didn't speak to anyone regarding this matter even my two closest friends, but as we spend know each other very well they can easily assume what is bothering me by distinguishing from personal to academic issues. Therefore, They try to address my problem with delinquency according to the matter which was, in this case, providing me with extra help regarding the courses that I had issues with. As you can see, long-term friendships are important to establish happiness in our life.
Second, it would raise the level of trust between friends. When you have many friends, you cannot focus on each one of them and by consequence, you cannot have a strong trustworthy friendship. The latter would create a sort of serenity and happiness when you are surrounded by them. For instance, my uncle, a businessman who encounter a lot of people in his domain, the majority of whom he considered as close friends. One day my uncle had a business downfall, and he lost every penny because of some precipitate decisions he made during that time. Surprisingly for him was he never imagined that the myriad of friends that he had that time turned on him with such cruelty. Not only they did not offer any moral or physical help but some they stubbed him in his back because they were hatching a diabolical plan to take him down. This experience taught me that the happiness of a person comes with friends he or she trust not with the huge number of persons you have in the repertoire.
In sum, though some may oppose this reasoning. I genuinely believe that the small friendships the person have over a long period in life are much important than having so many friends that you can acquire so easily. Not only will put the basis of a strong relationship but also it would build up a solid and trustful friendship. People should care more about their establishing long-term friendship rather than getting new ones with ease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...support the claim that friendships with a small number of people during a long-term is crucial fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ps with a small number of people during a long-term is crucial for the happiness of the per...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...ld disagree. As soon as I am concern, I agree with the fact that maintaining friendships with a small ra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 563, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... happiness than having numerous friends in an easy way for two essential reasons. First, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nship. Having few friends during a long period of time will definitely solidify the friendship...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'sort of'.
Suggestion: sort of
... solidify the friendship and build up a sort of a mutual understanding. This means that t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s, so it did irritate me for a while. I didnt speak to anyone regarding this matter e...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'regards'.
Suggestion: regards
...me for a while. I didnt speak to anyone regarding this matter even my two closest friends...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 886, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to regard' or 'regard'.
Suggestion: to regard; regard
...this case, providing me with extra help regarding the courses that I had issues with. As ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 917, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'trusts'.
Suggestion: trusts
...f a person comes with friends he or she trust not with the huge number of persons you...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 78.0 43.0788530466 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2527.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 533.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74108818011 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.679148207 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1573396114 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.291666667 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2083333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337584622877 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922933209338 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912893079117 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229017796597 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841505008875 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.