Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some claim that history is essential for all people because those who forget history would never succeed. However, I believe that while history is beneficial for some people, this may not be the case for others, and the universities should not make history course a mandatory for all students. The reason to why I believe in such way will be elaborated in more detail below.
First of all, as mentioned above, history is not beneficial for all students. University is a place for students to pursue their interest and prepare themselves before diving into the job market. However, for students who are majoring in fields that are irrelevant to history would have a neutral effect on getting employed. As an example, for students who are majoring in engineering, having knowledge in history would not have any advantageous effect on showing high performance in their field. Even companies favor those who have experiences that are relevant to their field of study, not in history. For them, taking history courses would be a waste of time and would rather participate in conducting projects such as implementing a small robot.
Furthermore, forcing students to pursue certain actions is always not an apropos solution and can have negative consequences. There may be students who are disinterested in history or have no talent in such field and having them to take history courses would provide them with severe pressure and depression. Even though they try hard to get good grades, they would not be able to keep up with the course due to lack of talent in history, leading them to losing self-confidence and getting depression. This would also affect their overall grades, and because most of the companies have a propensity of favoring students who have high grades, it would inhibit them from getting proper jobs. Also, high school students who abhor history would avoid admitting their application to the university and less students would be attending the university every year.
To sum up, while some may claim that history is necessary for all people, forcing students to take history courses would not have the same beneficial effect on everyone, and can even have detrimental effects on some students. Due to these reasons, I believe that the universities should not make it a mandatory for students to take history courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 798, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...their application to the university and less students would be attending the univers...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, may, so, while, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05440414508 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67903832915 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458549222798 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2739854254 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.9375 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214755863325 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920309003274 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430201156507 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154902179877 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0049197316102 0.0645574589148 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.