do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people are now less happy or less satisfied with their life than people in the past.

Essay topics:

do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people are now less happy or less satisfied with their life than people in the past.

It is established beyond any doubt that contemporary human lives in a sophisticated world. and our world is changing at a galloping rate. Some people believe that people in the past were more satisfied with their life. However, others don't think so. personally speaking, I believe that people in the past had a proper life. I will explore my reasons in the following essay.

To begin with, one should take into account the fact that people in the past had a happier life than now because they feel less stress and tension rather than now. Technological development is changing the world continuously so people should strive more than past to adapt themselves to new methods of life. My grandfather is a compelling example and demonstrates this fact well. When the computer was invented, my grandfather had some difficulty to cope with it. He liked to work with it and need it. In contrast, because of his age, he not only could not learn to work with it but also was so anxious and felt stress because all of his kids worked with it well. If he were able to learn how he can cope with the computer, He would have better sense.

Another remarkable reason is that nowadays people need to work harder than in the past. Because of the hard financial situation and economic stagnation in our country people have to work more than in the past. In contrast, in the past, our economic situation was more appropriate because at that time there was no financial sanction. As a result, in the past people were more satisfied with their life. My notion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my personal experience. My father has become a teacher from 20 years ago. When I was a child we had a well-suited life. My father could afford to buy a car ad house easily. In contrast, now we never have a proper life and never feel satisfied with our life and my father's income is inadequate completely. Had he lived in the past, he would have had a more comfortable life.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that people had a happier life in the past because they had less stress. Also, people in the past lived in a proper financial situation which makes them happier.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...y human lives in a sophisticated world. and our world is changing at a galloping ra...
^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...isfied with their life. However, others dont think so. personally speaking, I believ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...has become a teacher from 20 years ago. When I was a child we had a well-suited life...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62176165803 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57193221092 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466321243523 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6864770726 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.36 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.44 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369625912431 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108715579031 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10213021174 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25096346842 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048194970208 0.0645574589148 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.