Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
At the turn of the new century, with the development of humans and modern technology, more and more people tend to explore new things around the world. Actually, people attitudes towards traveling issue are varied from person to person. Although many would argue the traveling is the most important factor in character building but by yourself without any companion or family to be happy and enjoying the time, In my opinion, traveling with the group and guide has a far greater impact. I would suggest two reasons based on my general facts to support the argument.
The first aspect to point out is that many benefits quickly stem from traveling with the groups. Admittedly, the group of people has a great importance on the quality of one's life. I would like to mention noteworthy research conducted by CSR institute in India. The discovered results suggest that Seventy-Five Percent of the humans indulge themselves in traveling of the groups and with a guide to learn more and more things about the country which they reached it and spend enjoying time with each other. Furthermore, there has been a positive correlation between trying to travel with the group and happiness.
Secondly, the guide leader contributes to widening people's horizon, which will influence profoundly on individuals with him on trips. I still affirm the same idea because there is no guarantee that the tour guide is a great teacher to build character in different places. For instance, I remember one time I and some of my friend traveled to Paris. As we arrived at the city, we did not hire a tour guide, hence we just hanging around dazzlingly in the city for days. We just aware of the famous tower of Paris, but we had absolutely did not know anything about other tourist attraction of Paris. After a few days. we decided to hire a tour leader. Since we hired that guy, we just understood what a splendid city the Paris was. You see? You will never regret, if you ask someone's opinion, especially a skilled person.
To draw a conclusion, taking what I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that the tour leader is the most important in any trip to know a lot of things about the country which you arrived, and also one the perfect things, when to travel international trip is travel with groups to more enjoy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...as a great importance on the quality of ones life. I would like to mention noteworth...
^^^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...s tower of Paris, but we had absolutely did not know anything about other tourist a...
^^^
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bout other tourist attraction of Paris. After a few days. we decided to hire a tour l...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... attraction of Paris. After a few days. we decided to hire a tour leader. Since we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78195488722 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55193478628 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9615480921 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.421052632 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168027592846 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501598688166 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366766491653 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107629857993 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206362742153 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.