Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Traveling is beneficial for today's stressful life. Every day, people confronted with several barriers and included in many controvercies, so traveling is the best way to release this tension. Some people believe that group traveling which is led by tour guide is better than traveling alone, however, others hold an opposite opinion. In my view, the best method to travel is in group handled by a tour guide for two remarkable reasons.
The main reason is that people could gain valid information about history of various places by traveling in a group with tour guide. When people visit a new place, they want to get familiar with its adventures during past time. In order to this purpose, utilizing a group with a tour guide who has much experience in this major is useful. For example, last year I went to a trip by myself to Esfahan where is full of monuments and graceful art piece with great history. Although I visited all the famous places, I couldn't enjoy due to the lack of information. It was really disturbing to ask other people, therefore, in majority of times I had to search internet. Unfortunatly, not only it takes me a lot of time, but it also involved a different data about history of a monument. If I had traveled with a group led by a tour guide, I would get valid information and enjoy my tripe. This experience taught me traveling with others that handle by a tour guide is the best way to travel.
Another reason is that people would use travel time efficiently by join to a group with tour guide. In other words, people have restricted time to travel, hence they value the quality and quantity of visiting places. As tour guides have a great deal of knowledge, they could handle the travel time beneficial. For instance, statistics demonstrated a high level of people's pleasure in efficiency of involving in a group traveling with a tour guide. Researchers investigated two groups of indeviduals, one who travel by themselves and others who join to a group with a tour guide, to determine the efficiency of utilizing a week on a trip. The results represented that a group handled by a tour guide not just was able to visit more places in one week, but also the satisfaction of travelers were better than another group. It was due to the fact that tour guides spend much time to study traveling field, thus their experience increase the efficiency of people's tripe. As you can see, joining a group with a tour guide is best method to travel.
In conclusion, I support that idea of group traveling in which people could benefit the attendance of tour guide. Not only could people get reliable information, but they also use travel time efficiently. I think people should experince group traveling led by a tour guide to have enjoyable time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...get familiar with its adventures during past time. In order to this purpose, utilizing a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ough I visited all the famous places, I couldnt enjoy due to the lack of information. I...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1019, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
... see, joining a group with a tour guide is best method to travel. In conclusion, I su...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72164948454 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6734453468 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453608247423 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9196707885 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4166666667 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2083333333 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299576598427 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113467743819 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810445651079 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216170194614 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216324688923 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.