Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: books are not needed any more, because people can read information on computers.
With the advent of computers and the Internet, quite a few changes, whose proponents believe that they benefit the world, while whose critics see no great merits other than downsides in them, occur in the world. There is no exception for reading and using books. Nowadays, people often take advantage of e-books and utilize them widely. I subscribe to the idea that e-books eventually supplant ordinary books made of paper on account of their integration as well as flexibility.
People read e-books on computers, smart-phones, or tablets, providing a great number of other helpful tasks, with the result that they have access to a versatile and virtually integrated environment while reading e-books. This gives the e-books a great advantage over paper books. To illuminate my point, I would like to provide an illustrative example. Given the situation where one needs to perform either a calculation with a calculator or a search on the Internet about an issue while reading a context, if he or she uses e-books, they can easily use other applications on computers to this end. People, therefore, reach their aims promptly and conveniently. However, detractors of modern books express that the multi-task environment, a computer, is able to distract users’ attention. For instance, readers can check newspaper sites, listen to pieces of music, or watch videos while they are in the middle of reading a book. I confirm the fact that approximately, all of the e-book users have experienced such distraction, but once users are accustomed to this environment after a while, such distraction will become disappeared.
Another reason is that e-books are immensely flexible regarding the ways their users can both edit and share. Their users can write down notes and highlight texts wherever they want and remove them easily. In fact, there is practically infinite space for jotting points down in e-books, whereas paper books lack this feature. In addition, a person is able to copy and extract a part of a text, and then insert it to other places they are inclined to. Furthermore, people can put comments in parts of e-books and are able to share them online so that their colleagues in a collaborative project can observe them, think about them, and finally air their ideas without that they have to exchange physical books themselves. This feature of e-books makes conducting international projects possible and expeditious. It stands to reason that hundreds of thousands of e-books can be stored in a small disk, where an immense library is needed for storing and preserving such numbers of regular books.
To sum up, with all this taken into account, I do believe that e-books have been a substantial invention of today's’ world and will replace paper books in the future in that in terms of editing and sharing, they are more flexible, and with the help of easy accessibility to other software on computers, they become a comprehensive and integrated environment. I wish that everyone in the world, specifically people of impecunious countries, would have access to computers as well as the Internet, the most serious impediments of using e-books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'others'?
Suggestion: others
...or tablets, providing a great number of other helpful tasks, with the result that the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 970, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... I confirm the fact that approximately, all of the e-book users have experienced such dist...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2648.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13178294574 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83045538308 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 826.2 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4710469882 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.095238095 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203477302484 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059922922208 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039080661386 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132614343347 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151265636708 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.