Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone.
Making a decision is an inseparable action from daily human life. Human beings face a large number of situations they have to decide what to do. While most of their decisions during a day might have insignificant effects on their lives and can easily be changed at any point in the future, a small number of decisions can substantially affect their lives in a beneficial or detrimental manner, and their results cannot readily be alleviated or be irrevocable. Given my experience, I ironically disagree with the idea that any individual has to consult with other people and never decide alone while they are dealing with important decisions.
The first reason I provide has to with consultants’ common behaviors and features. Although it stands to reason that no one in the world knows all facts, it is not evident that one’s consultants, usually one’s friends and family, have more information and knowledge than him or her. Even if consultants are knowledgeable enough, they virtually air their opinions ambiguously in that they do not want to be engaged in subsequent probably unfavorable consequences. As a result, such vague and implicit advice and suggestions do not help people choose an appropriate option, but rather heighten their doubtfulness and confusion. Additionally, instead of relying on too cautious consultants, people can use the Internet to gather the objective information and knowledge on which they can confidently base their decision process on their own.
Another reason is associated with the fact that people will not take responsibility for their decisions when their decision results are undesirable. They will also blame their consultants for their unreasonable suggestion. Refusing the acceptance of decision responsibilities is more perilous than the incorrect decision itself, since if people do not accept the consequences of their decisions, they will not make a modicum of effort to restore occurring circumstances. I subscribe to the idea that people unconsciously want to postpone their responses to the problems and hardships they run into and to eliminate their concerns by consulting with other people. Nonetheless, they forget that the only person finally having to take an action according to their conditions is themselves, and the vague and indirect suggestion they receive is only an ephemeral painkiller.
In conclusion, I do consent to the stance that people should rely only on themselves when they make critical decisions on the ground that consultants virtually express vague suggestions, and people accept the responsibility of their decisions and attempt to succeed. I wish everyone would comprehend that no one is in their situations and that they are the only person to help themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rom daily human life. Human beings face a large number of situations they have to decide what to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... be changed at any point in the future, a small number of decisions can substantially affect thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, nonetheless, so, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36951501155 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09712426957 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519630484988 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6663595709 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.3125 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0625 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175791270863 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681740268121 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573321026825 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120820952976 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433989516899 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.