Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Company should pay for employees to get university degree.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, companies should try to improve their employees' performance at work. In this connection, there are several avenues, which increase workers' efficiency at work. Although contested by many that the matter of the companies which pay for workers' education is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that a company should not pay for employees to get university degrees, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, the crucial factor which causes thriving business is expert workers in a job field, so companies should not handle education expenses for workers. To be more specific, a company does not need to have a high-educated employee since performing many duties is not depend on workers' education degrees. According to my own experience, when I had a job interview for a profitable company, the so he did not pay attention to my educational resume and my degrees. After I was hired, they held a course and trained me to become familiar with my tasks. As a result, my previous degrees did not provide benefits for me as the academic knowledge was different from real job's challenges.
Second, employees are very busy, and they cannot allocate time to study; thus, companies do not need to provide funds for their education. To elucidate, workers should work eight hours a day, thereby feeling exhausted after work, so they do not have the energy as well as time to participate in a class. For example, my brother works at his office until 5 PM, so he rests when he arrives home. He prefers to either watch TV or plays sports after work to regain energy; by doing so, he feels sharply in the morning, leading to increment efficiency at work. His colleague goes to university after work, so he always feels sleepy while completing his tasks at work, and his manager is not satisfied with his performance.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that companies are not responsible for paying educational finance for employees. Not only do companies need workers who have job experience, but workers also do not have time and energy to study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...yee since performing many duties is not depend on workers education degrees. According...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...performing many duties is not depend on workers education degrees. According to my own ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 719, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is not satisfied with his performance. To conclude, while there are several arg...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96296296296 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79086360883 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2224980247 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238772970728 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869243049504 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731055921617 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160614822329 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558935841685 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.