Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on a cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I disagree with the idea that educating children is more challenging than it was in the past because of the online games, cell phone and social networking Web site. There are three reasons to support my point of view, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First, these services that prevent children from learning can be limited by parents. It might be true that a lot of children today spend longer time on the Internet compared with the children a few decades ago and it negatively affect their learning. However, parents can set a time limit for the cell phone or games. For instance, iPhone and iPad have a setting for parents to limit the time that children use certain application or the devices itself. What is more, in fact, my parents set time limit for the time I watch the television when I was small and it successfully made my grades in school pretty high so setting time limit for children to use electric devices or games will avoid affecting their education. These entertainment does not affect children's learning if correctly used.
Second, parents are even easier to get information because of the technology. Thanks to the technology innovation, we can reach out for information very easily. However, in the past, there was no tool to search for the information we want. For example, when I and my parents were searching for university, we could found myriads of information just by typing our questions such as the university's daily life, reputations, courses the university provide and so forth. If there were no Internet, parents would have hard time finding information and educating children.
Thirdly, playing online games or using social networking Websites sometimes provide great opportunities for children to find new interest. Studying subjects at school might not the only possibility the children have. Using the Internet enables them to encounter the new world. For instance, in high school, I was scrolling on social media and found a post that explains about the differences between artists and designers. I thought they were the same and since I was not a great artist, I thought designing would not be for me. However, because of the post I saw, I started to be intrigued by designing, that is not an art but telling the information effectively, and eventually, I decided to take a major in designing at the University. Without the Internet, I would not have found my talents in designing. Educating children using the Internet would be more meaningful than just focusing on learning the core subjects at school.
In conclusion, I believe that educating children is not more difficult than it was in the past. This is because parents can limit the time of using the Internet and parents can also get a lot of valuable information through the Internet that makes educating children easier. Additionally, using the Internet may be very beneficial for children's education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WEB_SITE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'website'?
Suggestion: Website
...games, cell phone and social networking Web site. There are three reasons to support my ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...ren a few decades ago and it negatively affect their learning. However, parents can se...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 720, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this entertainment' or 'These entertainments'?
Suggestion: This entertainment; These entertainments
...s will avoid affecting their education. These entertainment does not affect childrens learning if c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99180327869 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7823009547 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469262295082 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.487766211 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270161949514 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855374499576 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100057454645 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186951769144 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112810248157 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.