Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
With the help of technological development, there are different ways available for communication. We can talk to anyone via telephone calls, e-mails or letters. I agree with the statement that face-to-face communication is always better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls.
Firstly, in face-to-face communication people can see that the other person, with whom they are talking, is able to understand the concept or not. We can observe the person's behavior by their gesture. As a result, we can try to explain the conversation in a better way. For example, when I was working for a company at that time I have discussed one important project with my colleague. After discussion he said that he understood the concept, but the way he replied I observed that he did not get that correctly and then again I explained.
Secondly, face-to-face communication is also good for the people who are in a hurry. People can talk a lot in just a few minutes or seconds. This will help them to save their time. This is a very effective method for businesses or private companies. For instance, in my project, two teams were discussing on a topic and they were continuously sending emails. At one point, they decided to do face-to-face communication and saved their time.
Thirdly, in face-to-face communication people can reduce the conflicts. When people try to explain their matters through e-mail or telephone calls, then the other person sometimes misinterpret the situation. Moreover, these types of communication can create more problems for the person. In face-to-face communication, people can see each other and hence they can better understand the situation.
In conclusion, in this world, there are different kinds of people and everyone has their own opinion. If the people want to maintain a good relationship with the other persons, so it is always good to have face-to-face communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... the concept or not. We can observe the persons behavior by their gesture. As a result,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1746031746 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16938300969 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526984126984 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1708574666 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298843836796 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103271980408 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142962550302 0.0737576698707 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204746755443 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13748967438 0.0645574589148 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.