Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Most people will devote themselves to labor markets after school. However, considering that how to choose a job, there are disparate opinions among people. Some people claim that they should readily accept a secure job no matter whether the job is satisfying or not, while others hold the opposite opinion. In my view, I think that choosing a job merely depends on its stability is not a proper way.
Admittedly, by working for a secure job, people can instantly benefit from the salary and its stability. Nevertheless, since we now live in an ever-changing society, it is unjustifiable to say a secure job will be guaranteed in a long period. For example, the job of the financial consultant was seen as a secure job before. After all, money management is important for everyone and in every generation. But, now, this job has been largely superseded by a computer program, and thus this job is not deemed as secure anymore.
Besides, despite the volatility, we need to consider one's plan in their career. To be specific, people will work in the career for about two decades or even more. If workers do not enjoy their choices, they may be suffered for a long time doing what they don't like. Furthermore, this detrimental mood can vitiate the quality of their work. Consequently, not only the worker being struggled but the ramification will affect the company they serve.
By contrast, if one can choose their job providently and deliberately, it is more possible that they can win the satisfaction in their career and make substantial contributions to society. For example, my friend, Tom, who was major in electrical engineering, could not find a satisfactory job in the area of technology due to the great recession in 2008. He didn't deign to the job of factory operators that was available at that time but continue developing his own professional skills such as programming. After several months, he got a suitable job in Baidu, which he was willing to do. Now, he has developed several essential applications in the company which is popular on the Internet. The success came from his correct selection: do not choose the unsatisfying job.
To sum up, it is by no means to choose a job merely by whether the job is safe or not due to the unpredictability of the market. Also, an unsatisfactory job causes profound negative influences in the future in the personal aspect and the realm of corporations as well.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... a secure job no matter whether the job is satisfying or not, while others hold the opposite ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...uffered for a long time doing what they dont like. Furthermore, this detrimental moo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... due to the great recession in 2008. He didnt deign to the job of factory operators t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, after all, for example, i think, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88647342995 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92697914854 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567632850242 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0652060517 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9545454545 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248661207532 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744946774942 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513555649125 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141973066697 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385168977566 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... a secure job no matter whether the job is satisfying or not, while others hold the opposite ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...uffered for a long time doing what they dont like. Furthermore, this detrimental moo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... due to the great recession in 2008. He didnt deign to the job of factory operators t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, after all, for example, i think, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88647342995 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92697914854 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567632850242 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0652060517 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9545454545 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248661207532 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744946774942 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513555649125 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141973066697 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385168977566 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.