Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
AS we know, there are many academic fields and subjects in a vast domain from motion estimation of human, Computer science, philosophy to medical science and forth. So if someone wants to get learned about anything, Definitely it is impossible because it needs to the superior ability of learning and huge time!! We sure he/she would be overwhelmed and confused. But I should mention that sometimes there are some relations among some of these academic subjects which is undeniable. However, I strongly agree with the statement that it is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects, and I have some reasons to support my idea:
First of all, as I have mentioned before, there are some academic field and subject that have a very close relationship with each other. It seems reasonable and an outstanding privilege for someone who knows the first subject to know something about related subjects. Let me clear my point of view with a simple example. Take a computer engineer, for instance, because of the close relationship between Computer engineering and Electrical engineering. it’s very simple to learn electrical academic subjects, and it makes the learner very stronger than only a software developer. In other words, he could save time and money too.
Moreover, Companies tend to hire people who are capable of meeting companies requirement. I guess I mean how much you get stronger your chance to get hire increased. I mean you will seem much more desirable for companies because they would pay you as much as they would pay for another employee in the same position. So it is obvious that companies like to hire someone with more ability in performing companies tasks. But I should mention that if you get powerful in academic subjects, you may not find your desired job because your expectations have corresponded with your abilities or in rare cases, you may get overqualified.
So, for the mentioned reasons, I believe that it is better to know many academic subjects than to limit in a unique subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...ntioned before, there are some academic field and subject that have a very close rela...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It&apos
...engineering and Electrical engineering. it's very simple to learn electrical acade...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, i guess, i mean, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0293255132 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74819333879 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530791788856 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0821686374 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254167488139 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757660093125 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895780713522 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169971201689 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578640265055 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.