Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
In today's world, a job market is full of competition. A company likey to look after for the individual who have great skills in the certain world so they can make sure to fulfil their assigned task. In my opinion, I believe, having a expertise is necessary in order to survive in this tough world.
First, having a profound knowledge in specific one makes person distinct in their academic area and gain the relative career advantages. In the today's world full of competition and firm demanding a near perfect result, there are going to eye mostly on the personnel who is extreme prodigy in the certain field. That is benefical for the firm to get their desired outcome as their goal projection. In every position of the organization they hire a profession with a great capacity so it is futile for the person looking for the serious opportunity who is jack of all master of none. For instance: in the every multinational company we witnessed a lot of profession working in different area. Some are working in the management field and some are hired as IT expert; but none of them are taken because of they know both about the management and IT. That's why, a expert in any particular field gives the hiring community the impression for the quality human resource.
Again, there is good chance of getting success for the person having expertise, eventhough, in only one field. People tend to belive in the expert of any field rather than going after a person with a meager knowledge in the respective area. As a result, they start to gain a fame and money at the same time. To illustrate, let's take the case of the doctor. We actually take appointment of the doctor who have a long time practice in the medical field. It ensures us that he/she is capable enough to treat our problem efficiently. Due to craze of the patience for the doctor because of their expertise, they are also desired by the lot of the hospital so that a myriad patience will be attracted. In this way, a person expertise in any field can help to meet the summit of the success.
To sum up, the above aforementioned reasons delineate the importance of the expert person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... task. In my opinion, I believe, having a expertise is necessary in order to surv...
^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'profound knowledge'.
Suggestion: profound knowledge
...e in this tough world. First, having a profound knowledge in specific one makes person distinct ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...profound knowledge in specific one makes person distinct in their academic area a...
^^
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun profession seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of professions'.
Suggestion: a lot of professions
...very multinational company we witnessed a lot of profession working in different area. Some are wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...s IT expert; but none of them are taken because of they know both about the management and IT. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 849, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... know both about the management and IT. Thats why, a expert in any particular field g...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 860, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...about the management and IT. Thats why, a expert in any particular field gives th...
^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'meager knowledge'.
Suggestion: meager knowledge
...d rather than going after a person with a meager knowledge in the respective area. As a result, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 786, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...help to meet the summit of the success. To sum up, the above aforementioned reas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, so, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64566929134 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61244923072 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522309711286 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9131428566 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1578947368 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0526315789 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.071939363309 0.236089414692 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226610767099 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407915357118 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375103840714 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239445867535 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.