Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject
Is is long been a topic of debate that whether people should try to learn numerous things or try to achieve their highest point in jut one.The prompt suggests that it is better for anyone to have knowledge of many academic subjects as compared to having specialisation in just one subject. I do not agree with this assertion due to the following three reasons.
Firstly, a person who does not have specialisation in one particular subject and focuses on everything at once finds it extremely challenging if something unexpected comes up in their work. This creates issues in the real world as it impacts their problem solving skills. A person who does not know in and out of a problem with the software application; reporting that issue to the developer as a bug in the system. Now, because the software developer is not specialised on working on that particular application and has a broader knowledge of how everything works will find himself in tough situation while looking for the issue in depth. Therefore, it is suggested that anyone who wants to make their own life easy should work towards specialising in only one field instead of sailing in multiple boats at the same time.
Furthermore, in today's globalised world, competition in each field is increasing exponentially causing people who are not best as their work to fall behind. A person who try to have a broader knowledge of everything cannot be exceptionally talented at anything. This becomes a great disadvantage because there is always crowd of people who is better than you at what you do. This situation creates difficulty in not only finding jobs these days but also a person who is not specialised at their work may find it difficult to survive in such scenario.
Lastly, people or organisations who use the idea of specialisation in their field even if its just one field, complete their tasks in lesser time than the people who try to be good at everything. For instance, a research during industrial revolution in USA, brought an interesting finding to people's attention. They conducted research on what kind of work flow is the best to create production faster and efficient. During their study they found out that in contrast to the traditional system at that time which was; all the employees in the factories were performing all the tasks. Looking at this situation they came up with a new plan and implemented it on a larger level to find out which work flow is that best. This new plan involved a different structure for assigning work to the employees. They observed that when same work was assigned to a single employee every day, his speed of completing the task increased, leading to reduction of cost of production. This architecture became popular since then, in all the areas of production or businesses. This proves that when a person or employee just concentrates on one type of work and learning, they work more efficiently as compared to someone focusing on everything at once.
Some people may argue, that people specially students should try to gain knowledge of every subject and should not focus on only one subject in their curriculum to increase their knowledge. Though it may seem like a good idea, but isn't it why schools till certain standards teach all the subjects common for all students, so that they don't have to do that on their own later in life. Hence, a person should try to gain specialisation in one field instead of trying to achieve everything because it stops them to fully reach their potential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Is
Is is long been a topic of debate that whethe...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... achieve their highest point in jut one.The prompt suggests that it is better for a...
^^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...to be good at everything. For instance, a research during industrial revolution in USA, br...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
... USA, brought an interesting finding to peoples attention. They conducted research on w...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1203, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'focuses', 'focusses'.
Suggestion: focuses; focusses
...more efficiently as compared to someone focusing on everything at once. Some people m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...hough it may seem like a good idea, but isnt it why schools till certain standards t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s common for all students, so that they dont have to do that on their own later in l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, look, may, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 96.0 52.1666666667 184% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2924.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 602.0 407.700716846 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95335121839 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78484198183 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481727574751 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 896.4 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6036223286 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.130434783 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1739130435 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172714569472 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518842014632 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697810297962 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132838767172 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107103612873 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.