Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet.” Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that the internet has had a profound influence on our life. While some people believe that paper-based materials such as books and articles are a good source of information, others hold the view that the internet can meet their research need. I concur with the latter group's opinion. The reasons to substation my viewpoint are elaborated in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, the internet provides us an updated source of online articles, which we can find them by searching keywords. To be more specific, some websites are helping us to find the best results, just by searching the main words. For example, the Goggle website allows finding related texts or pictures or even films to our search. As a result, if we do perfect research, it gives us the best results, which is hard to find in books.
Furthermore, using the internet is very fast and does not waste our time. To put this in a vivid picture, if we have limited time to find a text about a special subject, the use of the internet will be a great idea. For instance, to get information about painters, it is fast just searching his/her name on the internet rather than find related text between books.
In conclusion, taking all the reasons and points mentioned above into account, one can conclude that the internet becomes an important part of our life. As it turns out, not only does it easy to find related subjects to our search, but it also helps to find related texts and films to our search very fast.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 266.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68796992481 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48383603742 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59022556391 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2876067207 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9230769231 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123461419154 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468132686064 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039031336766 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760582915263 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427594654502 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.