Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are suffering most of their life in stress and tension and that is happening because of their work. may be because of their working pattern, or the way the doing their work by sitting on a single place for hours and hours. Here I would like to agree to the given statement which seem more effective and appropriate in some cases. Yes, I believe it is more enjoyable to have a job where we can work only for three days a week for a long hour rather working for five days a week for shorter hours. I have two resone to support the give statement which will can we describe more by giving example.
First, if all the companies take the initiative for this to work for three days in a week and that too for long hour, most of the employees will enjoy this and concentrate on the given task/work thoroughly. which will definitely create a positive impact on company and productivity of can be improve by doing this.
So eventually this will help both employee’s and the companies as well. resone behind this people can give the ample amount of time to their family, friends and relatives. which they hardly can manage by working five days a week.
Second resone is that if people are used to follow this culture of working, they can give time to themselves and their health. as we all know sitting on a single place and working for hours can have an bad impact on your health, if we get time for the exercise we can have a healthy life.
So I believe this way of working can make the people's life easy and they can enjoy their work instead getting frustrated with it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: May
...hat is happening because of their work. may be because of their working pattern, or...
^^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...rate on the given task/work thoroughly. which will definitely create a positive impac...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Resone
...h employee’s and the companies as well. resone behind this people can give the ample a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nd the companies as well. resone behind this people can give the ample amount of tim...
^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...to their family, friends and relatives. which they hardly can manage by working five ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to their family, friends and relatives. which they hardly can manage by working five ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...ve time to themselves and their health. as we all know sitting on a single place a...
^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...le place and working for hours can have an bad impact on your health, if we get ti...
^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...elieve this way of working can make the peoples life easy and they can enjoy their work...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, well, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 292.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40410958904 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28609165383 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47602739726 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1142784905 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9230769231 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335722573803 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124913829653 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143664998499 0.0737576698707 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184945636115 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120133147662 0.0645574589148 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 86.8835125448 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.