Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Governments have a huge amount of money. They collect that money from taxes. The collected money should be beneficial for the citizens. The question here is, What is more beneficial for both citizens and the government? Should they spend the money on improving Internet access or they should spend the money on improving public transportation? In my opinion, The government should invest the money in the development of public transportation and its infrastucture for various reasons, such as decreasing the number of accidents and stopping the traffic jam and increasing the government income.
First, Investing money in the development of public transportation is crucial. the development will lead to a noticable decrease in the number of accidents and death rate. As example, In Egypt in 2014 the government started a project to develop and fix all the roads and bridges all over the country. The government started to develop the infrastructure and the public transportation in the biggest city in Egypt. Cairo is the biggest city and has the greatest number of accidents and the highest death rate. they started by developing the Ring road that connects the capital with all the neighbor cities. They fixed all the cracks then started to build a new bridge beside it. After that the government started to use buses that use electric power. As a result, in a recent study, the death rate and accidents were reduced. So developing public transportaion and infrastructure are very important.
Second, when the country develop the public transportaion, that will lead to less traffic jam and it will benefit all citizen. For instance, When Egypt Started to develop roads and bridges that impacted all people who works away from their houses. People who live in the capital travel everyday for about three to four hours to reach their jobs because there is a traffic jam. But after the development people started to reach their jobs earlier and they stopped wasting their time in traffic. So, it is clear that the development is very important.
Finally, it is obvious that, public transportaion development has a crucial impact on citizens and government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nt of public transportation is crucial. the development will lead to a noticable de...
^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...f accidents and the highest death rate. they started by developing the Ring road tha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tarted to build a new bridge beside it. After that the government started to use buse...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
.... People who live in the capital travel everyday for about three to four hours to reach ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, so, then, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12747875354 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86283295033 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464589235127 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4631267678 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2727272727 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0454545455 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154581724561 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516920814185 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609989867559 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934082841488 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899128879553 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.