Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science.” Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion.
There is no shortage of opinion on whether it is better for students to learn art and literature or math and science. In my opinion, I disagree with the statement; I think it is more important for people to study math and science. The following paragraphs will explain my two major reasons for this opinion.
First of all, science and math are the subjects which instills technical skills and knowledge in a student. They are listed among the four STEM subjects, which basically refers to technical subjects. This technical skills holds superior place than any other things because we are in a technological era and the advancement, development and progress of this twenty-first century depends on technically skilled manpower. For example, nowadays a lot of innocuous problems are being a huge problem for us. They affect our health, the food we eat, the water we drink and the environment we live in. Who can provide a resilient solution for this problem? A scientist who was trained with skills of science and math, who can understand, study and invent a solution. We are hearing inventions of plastic eating micro-robots, carbon sequestering artificial soil, air purifying machines; all of which help us to come back global warming. If students do not continue to study science and math, then such technology may never be created in the future. So, in order to make technological advancement we need students to study math and science.
Secondly, any academic subject which procures a better, secure job in the future always occupies a greater position. Every field demands hard-work, determination and creativity from its followers. For being a illustrious laureate in the field of arts and literature, the major role is played by the creativity shown by a person. However, not everyone can possess such skills. For example, I remember the outcome of our art classes in school days. Although all of us were taught the same basic skills of painting, only a hand-full were able to transcend beyond the ordinary and create something beautiful. Not all of us had the ability to think outside the n]box and create something novel. If all of us were to study arts and literature then it is safe to say that a majority of us would have been a complete failure. However, the fields of science and literature requires less creativity and anyone who shows perseverance and diligent effort can easily secure a livelihood sustaining job. So, fields of science and math also help to develop a bright future for a student.
In conclusion, I strongly believe it is more important for students to study science and math than it is to learn about literature and art. This is because math and science provide students with the knowledge to advance technology, and the ability to secure jobs in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'hold'.
Suggestion: hold
...chnical subjects. This technical skills holds superior place than any other things be...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 763, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rstand, study and invent a solution. We are hearing inventions of plastic eating micro-robo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 209, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eativity from its followers. For being a illustrious laureate in the field of ar...
^
Line 9, column 659, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '[' seems to be missing
...s had the ability to think outside the n]box and create something novel. If all o...
^
Line 13, column 265, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hnology, and the ability to secure jobs in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2335.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97867803838 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79136971758 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515991471215 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7133878652 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.76 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282713940324 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848466695966 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991811002155 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225697738696 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12047452588 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.