Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, our lives have drastically changed. People behave differently than they did a decade ago. Their demands are different than ever. It is thought by some people that investing in public transportation would make people's life easy. Others disagree with this statement, they would rather prefer that government should spend money in to sophisticate the internet service, where everyone could have access to it. In my opinion, the government should consider tho improve internet service around the nation.
To begin with, having Internet access in today's life is crucial because people work from their homes, without the need to commute. For example, statistics have shown that 78 percent of the populations are self-employed, their jobs are very close related to the use of the internet. If people do not have Internat service, they would not have a job. Therefore, their lives would be miserable. The government, is the only higher institution that should take care of its citizen's needs. In this case, they should make it easy for individuals to have access to a good quality of Internet.
Secondly, It is important to consider that the public transportation is only one problem in itself, but the improvement of Internet would solve many problems if it is available for everyone around the nation. For instance, a high speed Internet could solve the problem of the employment in the entire country. Also it could make peoples life easy because they could use it as a resource to educate themselves, and the list of benefits of having a good Internet goes on and on. Overall, people could benefit by solving too many problems that they may face throughout their lives if they have access to the Internet. That's why the government should seriously consider to allocate some founds into that perspective.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government should invest money in improving Internet access. This is because the majority of people use internet as the primary source of their job, so that they might not need to use public transportation at all. And because the Internet could solve more than one problem, compare that with only one issue of improving public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...decade ago. Their demands are different than ever. It is thought by some people that...
^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Internet) must be used with a third-person verb: 'accesses'.
Suggestion: accesses
...ion. To begin with, having Internet access in todays life is crucial because peopl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...f the employment in the entire country. Also it could make peoples life easy because...
^^^^
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...es if they have access to the Internet. Thats why the government should seriously con...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 658, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider allocating'.
Suggestion: consider allocating
...ats why the government should seriously consider to allocate some founds into that perspective. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1108033241 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71643620148 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484764542936 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0663651703 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.25 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243101260913 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788057107682 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652890874194 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177642761436 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715249837588 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.