Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation.
There is no denying that governments play an important role in humans' life. It is so vital for them to distinguish where they should spend money. Many people opine that governments have to put budget to improve the internet access, while others believe that public transportation enhancement is so crucial than the internet. From my point of view public transportation would be better choice and I will explore the reasons why I feel this way in the following essay.
To begin with, dedicating budget to improve the public transportation, will be result in society's public health. To clarify more, cars produce bad gases that not only has adverse effect on people's health, but also has increase the greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere, which would be resulted in global warming. Additionally, using public transporting vehicles will decrease the traffic jam that could help people be on time on their works or dates, and also increase their peace. Reducing individual's car using by improving the public transporting system will help these issues. Take my friend's grandfather for instance, he was 68 years old when he found out he got a lung cancer. Although his doctor advised him to abandon Toronto and choose a rural place for living, he did not because of his company and he could not stop being there and after a while he passed away. Toronto was an air polluted area due to the advance using cars and bikes. This example demonstrate how improvement in public transportation helps people to maintain healthy.
Moreover, spending money on such public vehicles will increase the governments revenue. As an illustration, governments need to have income for preparing their budgets to spend on many infrastructures. Public transporting can b e a good starting point owing to the fact that improving the facilities, encourage more people to utilize them and allocating tickets will increase the revenue. After a short while, government's income will increase and they become open hand to choose other aspects to invest. For example, I recently read a report in a major newspaper regarding this issue, which points out how the Armenia's government could control and enhance their income by putting their budget on a necessary field and surprisingly their revenue has grown during past decade, which they invest that on the internet improvements and also on building more parks and hospitals. Should governments assign money on basic infrastructures, they will increase their income by dedicating tickets for people.
By considering all the previously mentioned information, one can conclude that paying more attention to increasing the public transportation would be a better choice for governments rather than enhancing the internet access. Not only helps to increase the people's health, it will result in more revenue and income for society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... such public vehicles will increase the governments revenue. As an illustration, government...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... access. Not only helps to increase the peoples health, it will result in more revenue ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21615720524 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87121888826 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532751091703 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9226196542 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.45 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302358163413 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100304260505 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067888379391 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209294320715 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573867805167 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.