Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of civilization, life had been some complexities and harsh situations that people cannot deal with them without having some friends. Many people believe that having such a few friends for a long time would have a positive effect on happiness, while other opine that readily making more friends would be better. I am on board with the former group's idea and assumes that having fewer friends has more influence on happiness, so in what follows, I will describe my point of view.
The first reason for the note is that having a few long-lasting friends goes to a deep friendship that is influential to happiness. To clarify more, it is worth mentioning that passing the time, friends know each other better and completer, therefore they have the tact of what to do in various situations without disturbing each other. And so on, the friendship gets stronger and deeper. Take me for instance; I have a close friend named Sarah since I was a child, in early stages we had many conflictions and arguments in our relations, gradually we came close together due to knowing our sensitivities and individual's features, and our friendship is stronger than ever, which makes us happier. Hence, the more duration of friendship, the more happiness comes to life.
The second reason for my point of view is that fewer friends during life would result in happiness to the fact of trustfulness. To put in a more vivid picture, the term "trust" is so vital and crucial in people's lives and it helps to bring a sense of comfort since friends may be accessible to existences secrets. Therefore, having a more trustable and reliable friend is important, and this aim cannot be reachable if by passing them through some filtrations. For example, my sister Sadaf made a new friend with an unknown girl named Tara last year. Sadaf took her at our home and Tara was watching everywhere and listening to everything she could. After a while, Sadaf heard one of her secrets from her classmates; she was shocked when she realized Tara was the person who revealed that. If Sadaf had known her deeper, she would not have taken her home, and she would be happier now.
By considering all the previously mentioned information, one can conclude that having a few friends during a lifetime would help to be happier. Not only it helps to have a deeper friendship, but also it is more trustable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...e better. I am on board with the former groups idea and assumes that having fewer frie...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81553398058 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72187284084 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541262135922 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4859176147 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.705882353 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2352941176 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183712187416 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656097242661 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462259724214 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115399413337 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495029370178 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.