Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this modern era, life has more complexity and provides people many different news from all over the world. Many people opine that it is better to follow news that presented by people who have opposing view rather than similar view. I prefer to watch and read news from people who are in my similar view, I fell this way in two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, following news from the people who are in same point of view, provides people the opportunity of having better conversation and discussion. To clarify more, people feel free and do not hesitate to have some political or any other discussions with the one who has some similar beliefs. It is so crucial to have some conversation in many fields without any arguments and disagreeing, therefore, this leads people to have a good conversation and better conclusions. My experiment demonstrates this concept; I recall when I was in university in 2012, the professor divided us into some groups to discuss about that year presidential election. Our group was consisting of friends with similar view except one of us with another point of view. At first everybody was quiet and provided some comments, after a while, he abruptly shouted on us and tried to insist his view to all the group. If the group was containing of similar viewpoints, the guy would not shout out on us.
Second, read and watch news from the person who has same idea of people, results in more peace in life. As an illustration, it is more important to have a peaceful life, though, people should avoid of anything, which disturbs their quiet and calmness. The more disagreements people hear in life, the more tensions they get. When people hear news from people who have some in common, it may result in relaxation. In aforementioned example, I got a bad headache after that group discussion, which get worth after each sessions of that class. The headache that was because of a worthless disagreement, which had no results or any effect on people's life. Hence, people should try to avoid from negative persons to fine peace and happiness in their life.
By considering all the previous information, one can conclude that it is better to follow the news from the people who have similarity in their viewpoints. Not only helps them to have a peaceful life, but also provide them a better conversation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much different news', 'a good deal of different news'.
Suggestion: much different news; a good deal of different news
...has more complexity and provides people many different news from all over the world. Many people op...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...has more complexity and provides people many different news from all over the world. Many peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 664, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...t year presidential election. Our group was consisting of friends with similar view except one...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 911, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...his view to all the group. If the group was containing of similar viewpoints, the guy would no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78536585366 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67304610712 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49512195122 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0488846981 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.263157895 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05263157895 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247206404448 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910331044886 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817055491828 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170180422818 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977888796799 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.