Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
A controversial issue relating to whether it is better to listen to news from people that have different opinions than your own, has brought to the attention of public. Many people believe that listening people that have the same opinion as yours is much better than listening the opposite side. On the contrary, in my view, people should listen or watch news reported from people that have completely different views than yours.
First of all, listening people that hold different perspectives than yours will help you to hear the other side of the story, which you might have never thought about it before. As a result, I could better understand the situation and come up with a good judgement. For example, four years ago, when election happened, I was not sure for who I was going to vote. Before I reached in a conclusion, I wanted to hear both sides of the parties and understand better their intentions. If I were not listen to both sides, I would not have the the opportunity to make a smart decision about my vote. Overall, this experience tells us that people should be open and listen to other people with a different opinion than theirs, so they could come up with a better understanding.
Furthermore, watching news represented by individuals that hold different opinions than yours will allow me to become an open-minded person and be more confident about my thoughts related to that news. In fact, when people are exposed to a variety of viewpoints, that could help them to not being reluctant about their own views. For instance, I will mention the same scenario of my first example. After I watched on TV all the debates related to both competitive parties, I was able to not only to open my eyes by understanding both sides, but also I became confident on what my own opinion was. According to this experience, I believe that people who listen to people who think differently than you, will help them to come up with a powerful opinion on their own.
In conclusion, people should watch news reported by individuals that have different views. This is because that will help them to be exposed to the other side of the story. And because, that is going to enable people becoming open-minded and more confident on their own thoughts about the news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'listened'.
Suggestion: listened
... better their intentions. If I were not listen to both sides, I would not have the the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... listen to both sides, I would not have the the opportunity to make a smart decision ab...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... listen to both sides, I would not have the the opportunity to make a smart decision ab...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75443037975 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61684974343 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445569620253 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8872193464 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.470588235 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235382072347 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887152274871 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801938095987 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172962792838 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600927124359 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.