Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
It is axiomatic that in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live, human beings need a lot of commodities in their life in which facilitate their lives. Some factors like public transportation, internet access to name but a few are essential for every society. While many people believe that the government has to devote budget to expand internet infrastructure, on the other hand, some individuals hold the opinion that it is urgent that the rulers allocate finance to enhance public transportation. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter opinion and the reasons to support my idea are presented in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is crystal clear due to the fact the people experience a hectic life, it is necessary that the governments pay attention to mankind's life quality. In fact, many citizens have to spend a lot of their time in traffic congestion in order to commute to the other side of their cities to arrive at their workplaces. To be more specific, employees should work for long hours in a day so they need time to be in their house and enjoy their life besides their families. If the governments dedicate sufficient budget on buses, trains, and taxies worker does not need to wake up early in the morning and work from dawn to dusk.
Moreover, due to the fact that after industrial revolutionary times, countries endure a lot of problems; especially, ones that related to human health. In this vein, if people use their own vehicles to go to their works, air pollution becomes a problematic issue. In fact, the weather will harm mankind's health; specifically, it brings about heart disease and lung cancer. As a result, the government has to provide a huge amount of money on medical insurance in which to cover citizens' costs for their treatment. However, private sectors could contribute to help the governments but they have their own problems. For example, if a country suffers from the lack of medical equipment and hospitals, the private's companies won't aided the rulers in the order they have to pay a considerable amount of money to cover people's treatment costs due to the fact that if society does not have adequate medical centers, these insurances will pay significant money to hospitals.
In conclusion, having the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I do believe the governors have to consider the improvement of public transportation. Because it aided people to save a considerable amount of time also it reduces expenses to cure citizens who they will suffer from disease which made by air pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e improvement of public transportation. Because it aided people to save a considerable ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9632183908 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87526018859 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531034482759 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.190238849 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.9375 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1875 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140791740401 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457890810258 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434829966557 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839054680982 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320957053437 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.