Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours.
Today, getting information from others has top value in modern society. Being familiar with people opinions has numerous significant opportunities in making decisions. Although there are persons whose prefer to watch or read news that are similar to their own, in my opinion, it is brilliant to being familiar with people whose views are irrelevant from ours.
First and foremost, increasing the knowledge is the first reason why I believe that people need to be aware of different thinks. Actually, having a lot of ideas, either relevant or irrelevant, is a spectacular chance to being informed about others thinking and knowledge. As a matter of fact, living in this world is like fighting in the ring, and gathering all possible data from the people is the most important key for achieving in this war. Because, people can open their minds, improve their abilities and being aware of their weaknesses. For instance, I never forget when I was in a competition with my university students for mechanical institute, there were students whose had some opposite ideas in compare mine, but I could use those to increase my abilities and covering my weaknesses to being achieve in speaking for university, and eventually, I was selected by university students for university mechanical institute. That is why having all kind of views is dramatically important.
Secondly, finding reliable people is another reason that I think should people get different views from other ones. It is necessary to have communication with people to being successful in this modern world, because information is the success key. Moreover, when people listen to other's opinions, they can be able to know them much better. Anybody has some exclusive thinking that listening to him is the only way to know his real instinct. For example, my friend and I used to have conversation about political issues. In these conversation, sometimes, i find out that some of my friends are really fanatic that it makes them unreliable for me. Hence, being patient and listening to opposite views help people to know each other better.
In conclusion, although some persons prefer to listen or watch news that are similar to their opinions, I believe that we should pay attention both sides of views. Because, people can be able to know each other better and they can increase their knowledge, improve their abilities and cover their weaknesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
... own, in my opinion, it is brilliant to being familiar with people whose views are ir...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this conversation' or 'these conversations'?
Suggestion: this conversation; these conversations
...conversation about political issues. In these conversation, sometimes, i find out that some of my ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...sues. In these conversation, sometimes, i find out that some of my friends are re...
^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r abilities and cover their weaknesses.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a matter of fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11898734177 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74126600983 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.6990884744 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213981884861 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752486838005 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893928389766 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153564426843 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909112198129 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.